Abstract
References
- Aydın, M. (1991). Eğitim yönetimi (3. Baskı). Ankara: Hatiboğlu.
- Aydıner, B. B. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam amaçlarının alt boyutlarının genel öz-yeterlik, yaşam doyumu ve çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
- Balaban, Ö., Çakmak, D. (2016). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kişisel İncelenmesi. Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 5 (1), 1-17. Yönelik Algılarının
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 368-369). New York: Wiley.
- BURGER, Jerry M. (2006), Kişilik, 1. Basım, Çev.:İnan Deniz Erguvan Sarıoğlu, Kaknüs Yayınları, İstanbul, s. 186, 421, 424.
- Çınar, H. & Keskin, N. (2015). Öğrencilerin sosyal görünüş kaygısı- nın öğrenim yeri tercihlerine etkisi. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, 14, 457-464.
- Doğan T. (2010). Sosyal Görünüş Kaygısı Ölçeği’nin (SGKÖ) Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 151-159.
- Frankl, V. (1997), İnsanın Anlam Arayışı, Çev.: Selçuk Budak, Öteki Yayınevi, Ankara.
- Hart, E. A., Leary, M.R. & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11: 94-104.
- Hart, T. A., Flora, D. B., Palyo, S. A., Fresco, D. M., Holle, C., & Heimberg, R. C. (2008). Development and Examination of the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale. Assessment, 15, 48-59.
- Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1995). Social anxiety. New York: Guilford.
- Sezer, S. (2005), “Anlam İhtiyacı” Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Bülteni, Cilt 2, Sayı 10, Haziran, s. 56-60.
- Yetim, Ü. (2001). Toplumdan bireye mutluluk resimleri. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
Abstract
The study was conducted in the descriptive and relational scanning model. A total of 730 university students, including 216 men and 514 women, study at various faculties of Erciyes University, have sampled the study. 572 78.4% students were between 17 and 21 years old, 143 19.6% were between 22 and 26, 3 0.4% were between 27 and 31, 6 0.8% were in the 32-36 age and 6 0.8% were 37 years or older. Research data collection tools "Life Goals Scale LGS " and personal information form were used for validity reliability study. Descriptive statistics, correlation, ANOVA, H test, T test, U test and simple regression analysis technique were used in the analysis of the data. According to the study's findings, material gain and physical appearance from the lower dimensions of life, explaining the anxiety of social appearance in a meaningful positive way, personal development from the lower dimensions of life, social responsibility and individual awareness social it has been found to explain the anxiety of appearance in a meaningful negative direction. There was no significant difference in gender between the social aspect anxiety levels of university students. Female students' life goals levels are significantly lower than male students' life goals levels. Social aspect anxiety levels of students in 1st grade, 2, 3 and 4. Students studying in the classroom, 2. Social appearance anxiety levels of the students in the class 3. Social appearance anxiety levels of students studying in the classroom are significantly higher. There was no significant difference between the social appearance anxiety and life goals levels of the university students according to the number of siblings. Social appearance anxiety levels of university students between the ages of 17 and 21 are significantly higher than those of university students between the ages of 22 and 26. It is observed that the social appearance anxiety and life goals levels of university students do not differ according to their marital status. Students with high family income were found to have significantly higher life goals levels than students with low and moderate family income.
Keywords
Social appearance anxiety Life goals Financial gain Physical appearance Individual awareness
References
- Aydın, M. (1991). Eğitim yönetimi (3. Baskı). Ankara: Hatiboğlu.
- Aydıner, B. B. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam amaçlarının alt boyutlarının genel öz-yeterlik, yaşam doyumu ve çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
- Balaban, Ö., Çakmak, D. (2016). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kişisel İncelenmesi. Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 5 (1), 1-17. Yönelik Algılarının
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 368-369). New York: Wiley.
- BURGER, Jerry M. (2006), Kişilik, 1. Basım, Çev.:İnan Deniz Erguvan Sarıoğlu, Kaknüs Yayınları, İstanbul, s. 186, 421, 424.
- Çınar, H. & Keskin, N. (2015). Öğrencilerin sosyal görünüş kaygısı- nın öğrenim yeri tercihlerine etkisi. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, 14, 457-464.
- Doğan T. (2010). Sosyal Görünüş Kaygısı Ölçeği’nin (SGKÖ) Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 151-159.
- Frankl, V. (1997), İnsanın Anlam Arayışı, Çev.: Selçuk Budak, Öteki Yayınevi, Ankara.
- Hart, E. A., Leary, M.R. & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11: 94-104.
- Hart, T. A., Flora, D. B., Palyo, S. A., Fresco, D. M., Holle, C., & Heimberg, R. C. (2008). Development and Examination of the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale. Assessment, 15, 48-59.
- Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1995). Social anxiety. New York: Guilford.
- Sezer, S. (2005), “Anlam İhtiyacı” Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Bülteni, Cilt 2, Sayı 10, Haziran, s. 56-60.
- Yetim, Ü. (2001). Toplumdan bireye mutluluk resimleri. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019Volume: 2 Issue: 2 |
ISSN: 2667-4491
Dear Authors,
According to the February 25, 2020 dated ULAKBIM decision, all kinds of researches conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from participants using survey, interview, focus group study, observation, experiment, interview techniques, and the use of humans and animals (including materials/data) for experimental or other scientific purposes require an Ethics Committee certificate.
The ethics committee approvals obtained in accordance with the “publication policy” of the articles submitted to the Turkish Academic Social Sciences Research Journal must be specified in the METHOD section of the article and uploaded to the system. Publications with plagiarism report over 20% and studies without ethics committee approval will not be evaluated for publication in our journal.
Thank you for your attention and understanding.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Turkish Research Journal of Academic Social Science (TURAJAS) is indexed by the following national and international scientific indexing services: