Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ

Year 2021, Issue: 42, 97 - 111, 08.01.2021

Hava Yaşbay Kobal

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.647568

Abstract

Çalışmada,
Türkiye’deki sosyal girişimlerin türünün ve amaçlarının; finansal
sürdürülebilirliği hangi yollardan sağladıklarının; sosyal girişimcilerin
sosyal fayda ve ticari kazanç gibi çelişkili görünen talepler için hangi tür
liderlik becerilerine sahip olduklarının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Smith vd.
(2012) tarafından yapılan araştırmanın devam çalışması niteliğindeki araştırmada
on bir sosyal girişimci ile yapılan görüşmelerden edinilen veriler NVivo 12
nitel veri analizi programında analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, sosyal girişimlerin
çoğunun hibrid örgüt biçiminde yapılandığını, topluma hizmet için genellikle
sivil toplumu güçlendirmek ve özel bireylere destek olmanın en çok benimsenen
amaçlar olduğunu göstermektedir. Sosyal girişimler gelirlerini ise genellikle
ürün satışlarından ve eğitim/danışmanlık gibi faaliyetlerden elde etmektedirler.
Ayrıca, sosyal girişimcilerin sosyal fayda ve ticari kazanç gibi çelişkili talepleri
bütünleştirmek için kararlı-tutarlı olma ve kararlara katılımı sağlamak gibi
paradoksal liderlik becerilerine sahip olmaları gerektiği saptanmıştır. Sonuçlar
Smith vd.’nin (2012) araştırma sonuçlarıyla uyumludur.

Keywords

Sosyal girişim Sosyal girişimcilik

References

  • Alter, S. K. (2003). “Social Enterprise: A Typology of theFieldContextualized in Latin America.Inter-American Development Bank WorkingPaper”, Washington DC http://www.iadb.org/sds/doc/228070wc.socialenterprise.pdf (02.07.2018).
  • Alvord, S. H., Brown, L.D. ve Letts, C.W. (2004). “SocialEntrepreneurshipandSocietalTransformation: An ExploratoryStudy”, TheJournal of AppliedBehavioralScience, 40/3, 260-282.
  • Ataseven, B. (2012). “Nitel Bilimsel Araştırmalarda Veri Kalitesinin Önemi”,Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B Dergisi, 33/2, 543-564.
  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H. ve Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). “SocialandCommercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, orBoth?”, EntrepreneurshipTheoryandPractice,January, 1-19.
  • Boschee, J. (2001). “Eight Basic PrinciplesforNonprofitEntrepreneurs”, Nonprofit World, 19/4, 15-18.
  • Cameron, K.S. (1986). “Effectiveness As Paradox: ConcensusandConflict in Conceptions of OrganizationalEffectiveness”, Management Science,32/5, 539-553.
  • Dacin, P.A.,Dacin, M.T. ve Matear, M. (2010). “SocialEntrepreneurship: WhyWeDon’tNeed a New Theoryand How WeMoveForwardFrom Here”,Academy of Management Perspectives,August,36-56.
  • Danko, A., Brunner, C. ve Kraus, S. (2011). “SocialEntrepreneurship – An Overview of theCurrentState of Research”,EuropeanJournal of Management, 11/1, 82-91.Dees, JG. (1998). TheMeaning of SocialEnterpreneurship,1-5. www.fukua.duke.edu/centers/case/documents/Dees_SEdef.pdf . (28.05.2018).
  • Dees, G. (2007). “TakingSocialEntrepreneurshipSeriously”,Society, 44/3, 24-31.
  • Ersen, T.B., Kaya, D. ve Meydanoğlu, Z. (2010). Sosyal Girişimler ve Türkiye İhtiyaç Analizi Raporu. İstanbul: TÜSEV Yayınları, Aralık, No:50.
  • Hibbert, S. A., Hogg, G. ve Quinn, T. (2002). “Consumer ResponsetoSocialEntrepreneurship: The Case of theBigİssue in Scotland”,International Journal of NonprofitandVoluntarySector Marketing, 7/3, 288-301.
  • KoeHweeNga, J. ve Shamuganathan, G. (2010). “TheInfluence of PersonalityTraitsandDemographicFactors on SocialEntrepreneurship Start UpIntentions”, Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259-282.
  • Lavine, M. (2014). “ParadoxicalLeadershipandtheCompeting Values Framework”, Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2014/1, 14098-14098.
  • Lehner, O.M. ve Kansikas, J. (2012). “OpportunityRecognition in SocialEntrepreneurship : AThematic Meta Analysis”, TheJournal of Entrepreneurship, 21/1, 25-58.
  • Lewis, M.W., Andriopoulos, C.ve Smith, W.K. (2014). “ParadoxicalLeadershiptoEnable Strategic Agility”,University of California Berkeley,56/3, 58-77.
  • Lewis, M.W. (2000). “ExploringParadox: Toward A MoreComprehensive Guide”, Academy of ManagementReview, 25/4, 760-776.
  • Mair, J. ve Marti, I. (2006). “SocialEntrepreneurshipResearch: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, andDelight”, Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44.
  • Mair, J., Robinson, J. ve Hockerts, K. (2006). SocialEntrepreneurship.Palgra and Macmillan, New York.
  • Miller, T. L.VeWesley, C. L. (2010). “AssessingMissionandResourcesforSocialChange: An OrganizationalIdentityPerspective on SocialVentureCapitalists’ DecisionCriteria”, Entrepreneurship: TheoryandPractice, 705-733.
  • Mort, S.G.,Weerawardena ve Carnegie K. (2003). “SocialEntrepreneurship: TowardsConceptualisation”,International Journalof NonprofitandVoluntarySector Marketing, 8/1 76-88.
  • Mulgan, G.,Tucker, S., Ali, R. ve Sanders, B. (2007). “SocialInnovation: WhatIt Is, WhyItMattersand How It can be Accelerated?.Oxford Said Business School. Skoll Center forSocialEntrepreneushipWorkingPaper, http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/761/1/Social_Innovation.pdf. (10.08.2018).
  • Murphy P. ve Coombes S.M. (2009). “A Model of SocialEntrepreneurialDiscovery”, Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 325-336.
  • Prabhu, G.N. (1999). “SocialEntrepreneurialLeadership”,Career Development International, 4/3, 140-145.
  • Peredo, A.M. ve McLean, M. (2006). “SocialEntrepreneurship: A Critical Review of theConcept”, Journal of World Business, 41, 56-65.
  • Regine, B. ve Lewin, R. (2000). “Leading at theEdge: How LeadersInfluenceComplexSystems”, Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates, 2/2, 5-23.
  • Sharir, M. ve Lerner, M. (2006). “GaugingtheSuccess of SocialVenturesInitiatedbyIndividualSocialEntrepreneurs”, Journal of World Business, 41, 6–20.
  • Saifan, S.A. (2012). “SocialEntrepreneurship: Definition andBoundaries”, Technology Innovation Management, February, 22-27.
  • Smith, W.K. ve Tushman, M.L. (2005). “Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model forManagingInnovationStreams”,OrganizationScience, 16/5, 522-536.
  • Smith, W. K. ve Lewis, M. W. (2011). “Toward A Theory of Paradox: A DynamicEquilibrium Model of Organizing”, Academy of Management Review, 36/2, 381-403.
  • Smith, W. K. ve Lewis, M. W. (2012). “LeadershipSkillsforManagingParadox”, IndustrialandOrganizationalPsychology,5, 232-235.
  • Smith, W. K.,Besharov M.L., Wessels, A.K. ve Chertok, M. (2012). “A ParadoxicalLeadership Model forSocial Entrepreneurs: Challenges, LeadershipSkills, andPedagogical Tools forManagingSocialand Commercial Demands”, Academy of Management Learning &Education,11/3, 463-478.
  • Tan, W.L., Williams, J.N. ve Tan, T.M. (2005). “Social' in 'SocialEntrepreneurship: AltruismandEntrepreneurship”, International Entrepreneurshipand Management Journal, 1/3, 353-365.
  • Thompson, J. ve Doherty, B. (2006). “TheDiverse World of Social Enterprise: A Collection of Social Enterprise Stories”, International Journal of SocialEconomics, 33 (5/6), 361-375.
  • Thompson, J. (2008). “Social Enterprise andSocialEntrepreneurship: WherehaveWeReached?: A summary of Issuesand Discussion Points”, Social Enterprise Journal, 4/2, 149-161.
  • Toplum Gönüllüleri (2013), Üniversitelerde Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Sosyal Girişimcilik Pilot Projesi Raporu. http://www.sogla.org
  • Tracey, P. ve Phillips, N.W. (2007). “TheDistinctiveChallenge of EducatingSocialEntrepreneurs: A Post-ScriptandRejoindertothe Special Issue on EntrepreneurshipEducation”, Academy of Management Learning &Education, 6/2, 264 –271.Tusev.org.tr, (Ekim 2019).
  • Weerawardena, J. ve Mort S.G. (2006). “InvestigatingSocialEntrepreneurship: A Multidimensional Model”, Journal of World Business, 41, 21-35.
  • Young, Dennis R. (2001). “Social Enterprise in the United States: AlternateIdentitiesand Forms”, Case Western ReserveUniversity”, The EMES Conference, TheSocial Enterprise: A ComparativePerspective, Trento, İtaly.
  • Zahra, S.A.,Rawhouser, H.N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D.O., ve Hayton, J.C. (2008). “Globalization of SocialEntrepreneurshipOpportunities”, Strategic EntrepreneurshipJournal,2, 117-131.
  • Zahra, S.A.,Gedajlovic, E., Bhawe, N.,Neubaum, D.O., ve Shulman, J.M. (2009). “A Typology of SocialEntrepreneurs: Motives, SearchProcessesandEthicalChallenges”, Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519-532.
  • Zhang, Y.,Waldman, D.A., Han, Y. ve Li, X. (2015). “ParadoxicalLeaderBehaviors in People Management: Antecedentsand Consequences”, Academy of Management Journal,58/2, 538-566.

Year 2021, Issue: 42, 97 - 111, 08.01.2021

Hava Yaşbay Kobal

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.647568

Abstract

References

  • Alter, S. K. (2003). “Social Enterprise: A Typology of theFieldContextualized in Latin America.Inter-American Development Bank WorkingPaper”, Washington DC http://www.iadb.org/sds/doc/228070wc.socialenterprise.pdf (02.07.2018).
  • Alvord, S. H., Brown, L.D. ve Letts, C.W. (2004). “SocialEntrepreneurshipandSocietalTransformation: An ExploratoryStudy”, TheJournal of AppliedBehavioralScience, 40/3, 260-282.
  • Ataseven, B. (2012). “Nitel Bilimsel Araştırmalarda Veri Kalitesinin Önemi”,Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B Dergisi, 33/2, 543-564.
  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H. ve Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). “SocialandCommercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, orBoth?”, EntrepreneurshipTheoryandPractice,January, 1-19.
  • Boschee, J. (2001). “Eight Basic PrinciplesforNonprofitEntrepreneurs”, Nonprofit World, 19/4, 15-18.
  • Cameron, K.S. (1986). “Effectiveness As Paradox: ConcensusandConflict in Conceptions of OrganizationalEffectiveness”, Management Science,32/5, 539-553.
  • Dacin, P.A.,Dacin, M.T. ve Matear, M. (2010). “SocialEntrepreneurship: WhyWeDon’tNeed a New Theoryand How WeMoveForwardFrom Here”,Academy of Management Perspectives,August,36-56.
  • Danko, A., Brunner, C. ve Kraus, S. (2011). “SocialEntrepreneurship – An Overview of theCurrentState of Research”,EuropeanJournal of Management, 11/1, 82-91.Dees, JG. (1998). TheMeaning of SocialEnterpreneurship,1-5. www.fukua.duke.edu/centers/case/documents/Dees_SEdef.pdf . (28.05.2018).
  • Dees, G. (2007). “TakingSocialEntrepreneurshipSeriously”,Society, 44/3, 24-31.
  • Ersen, T.B., Kaya, D. ve Meydanoğlu, Z. (2010). Sosyal Girişimler ve Türkiye İhtiyaç Analizi Raporu. İstanbul: TÜSEV Yayınları, Aralık, No:50.
  • Hibbert, S. A., Hogg, G. ve Quinn, T. (2002). “Consumer ResponsetoSocialEntrepreneurship: The Case of theBigİssue in Scotland”,International Journal of NonprofitandVoluntarySector Marketing, 7/3, 288-301.
  • KoeHweeNga, J. ve Shamuganathan, G. (2010). “TheInfluence of PersonalityTraitsandDemographicFactors on SocialEntrepreneurship Start UpIntentions”, Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259-282.
  • Lavine, M. (2014). “ParadoxicalLeadershipandtheCompeting Values Framework”, Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2014/1, 14098-14098.
  • Lehner, O.M. ve Kansikas, J. (2012). “OpportunityRecognition in SocialEntrepreneurship : AThematic Meta Analysis”, TheJournal of Entrepreneurship, 21/1, 25-58.
  • Lewis, M.W., Andriopoulos, C.ve Smith, W.K. (2014). “ParadoxicalLeadershiptoEnable Strategic Agility”,University of California Berkeley,56/3, 58-77.
  • Lewis, M.W. (2000). “ExploringParadox: Toward A MoreComprehensive Guide”, Academy of ManagementReview, 25/4, 760-776.
  • Mair, J. ve Marti, I. (2006). “SocialEntrepreneurshipResearch: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, andDelight”, Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44.
  • Mair, J., Robinson, J. ve Hockerts, K. (2006). SocialEntrepreneurship.Palgra and Macmillan, New York.
  • Miller, T. L.VeWesley, C. L. (2010). “AssessingMissionandResourcesforSocialChange: An OrganizationalIdentityPerspective on SocialVentureCapitalists’ DecisionCriteria”, Entrepreneurship: TheoryandPractice, 705-733.
  • Mort, S.G.,Weerawardena ve Carnegie K. (2003). “SocialEntrepreneurship: TowardsConceptualisation”,International Journalof NonprofitandVoluntarySector Marketing, 8/1 76-88.
  • Mulgan, G.,Tucker, S., Ali, R. ve Sanders, B. (2007). “SocialInnovation: WhatIt Is, WhyItMattersand How It can be Accelerated?.Oxford Said Business School. Skoll Center forSocialEntrepreneushipWorkingPaper, http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/761/1/Social_Innovation.pdf. (10.08.2018).
  • Murphy P. ve Coombes S.M. (2009). “A Model of SocialEntrepreneurialDiscovery”, Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 325-336.
  • Prabhu, G.N. (1999). “SocialEntrepreneurialLeadership”,Career Development International, 4/3, 140-145.
  • Peredo, A.M. ve McLean, M. (2006). “SocialEntrepreneurship: A Critical Review of theConcept”, Journal of World Business, 41, 56-65.
  • Regine, B. ve Lewin, R. (2000). “Leading at theEdge: How LeadersInfluenceComplexSystems”, Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates, 2/2, 5-23.
  • Sharir, M. ve Lerner, M. (2006). “GaugingtheSuccess of SocialVenturesInitiatedbyIndividualSocialEntrepreneurs”, Journal of World Business, 41, 6–20.
  • Saifan, S.A. (2012). “SocialEntrepreneurship: Definition andBoundaries”, Technology Innovation Management, February, 22-27.
  • Smith, W.K. ve Tushman, M.L. (2005). “Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model forManagingInnovationStreams”,OrganizationScience, 16/5, 522-536.
  • Smith, W. K. ve Lewis, M. W. (2011). “Toward A Theory of Paradox: A DynamicEquilibrium Model of Organizing”, Academy of Management Review, 36/2, 381-403.
  • Smith, W. K. ve Lewis, M. W. (2012). “LeadershipSkillsforManagingParadox”, IndustrialandOrganizationalPsychology,5, 232-235.
  • Smith, W. K.,Besharov M.L., Wessels, A.K. ve Chertok, M. (2012). “A ParadoxicalLeadership Model forSocial Entrepreneurs: Challenges, LeadershipSkills, andPedagogical Tools forManagingSocialand Commercial Demands”, Academy of Management Learning &Education,11/3, 463-478.
  • Tan, W.L., Williams, J.N. ve Tan, T.M. (2005). “Social' in 'SocialEntrepreneurship: AltruismandEntrepreneurship”, International Entrepreneurshipand Management Journal, 1/3, 353-365.
  • Thompson, J. ve Doherty, B. (2006). “TheDiverse World of Social Enterprise: A Collection of Social Enterprise Stories”, International Journal of SocialEconomics, 33 (5/6), 361-375.
  • Thompson, J. (2008). “Social Enterprise andSocialEntrepreneurship: WherehaveWeReached?: A summary of Issuesand Discussion Points”, Social Enterprise Journal, 4/2, 149-161.
  • Toplum Gönüllüleri (2013), Üniversitelerde Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Sosyal Girişimcilik Pilot Projesi Raporu. http://www.sogla.org
  • Tracey, P. ve Phillips, N.W. (2007). “TheDistinctiveChallenge of EducatingSocialEntrepreneurs: A Post-ScriptandRejoindertothe Special Issue on EntrepreneurshipEducation”, Academy of Management Learning &Education, 6/2, 264 –271.Tusev.org.tr, (Ekim 2019).
  • Weerawardena, J. ve Mort S.G. (2006). “InvestigatingSocialEntrepreneurship: A Multidimensional Model”, Journal of World Business, 41, 21-35.
  • Young, Dennis R. (2001). “Social Enterprise in the United States: AlternateIdentitiesand Forms”, Case Western ReserveUniversity”, The EMES Conference, TheSocial Enterprise: A ComparativePerspective, Trento, İtaly.
  • Zahra, S.A.,Rawhouser, H.N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D.O., ve Hayton, J.C. (2008). “Globalization of SocialEntrepreneurshipOpportunities”, Strategic EntrepreneurshipJournal,2, 117-131.
  • Zahra, S.A.,Gedajlovic, E., Bhawe, N.,Neubaum, D.O., ve Shulman, J.M. (2009). “A Typology of SocialEntrepreneurs: Motives, SearchProcessesandEthicalChallenges”, Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519-532.
  • Zhang, Y.,Waldman, D.A., Han, Y. ve Li, X. (2015). “ParadoxicalLeaderBehaviors in People Management: Antecedentsand Consequences”, Academy of Management Journal,58/2, 538-566.
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hava Yaşbay Kobal 0000-0002-2589-785X

Publication Date January 8, 2021
Acceptance Date July 8, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 42

Cite

APA Yaşbay Kobal, H. (2021). SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(42), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.647568
AMA Yaşbay Kobal H. SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ. PAUSBED. January 2021;(42):97-111. doi:10.30794/pausbed.647568
Chicago Yaşbay Kobal, Hava. “SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 42 (January 2021): 97-111. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.647568.
EndNote Yaşbay Kobal H (January 1, 2021) SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 42 97–111.
IEEE H. Yaşbay Kobal, “SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ”, PAUSBED, no. 42, pp. 97–111, January 2021, doi: 10.30794/pausbed.647568.
ISNAD Yaşbay Kobal, Hava. “SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 42 (January 2021), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.647568.
JAMA Yaşbay Kobal H. SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ. PAUSBED. 2021;:97–111.
MLA Yaşbay Kobal, Hava. “SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 42, 2021, pp. 97-111, doi:10.30794/pausbed.647568.
Vancouver Yaşbay Kobal H. SOSYAL GİRİŞİMLER VE PARADOKSAL LİDERLİK BECERİLERİ. PAUSBED. 2021(42):97-111.
 Download Cover Image