Research Article

Are Turkish Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards Comprehensible? An Investigation on Readability

Volume: 8 Number: 2 January 3, 2026
EN TR

Are Turkish Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards Comprehensible? An Investigation on Readability

Abstract

In recent years, concerns have been increasingly raised in the international literature regarding the inadequate comprehensibility of accounting standards by practitioners. Building upon this concern and addressing the gap in the national literature, this study aims to investigate the readability levels—and consequently the understandability—of Turkish Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards. The findings reveal that the readability scores of the relevant standards indicate they are very difficult, difficult, or moderately difficult to read. This suggests that these standards may not be easily readable by their intended audience, potentially affecting their overall understandability. The ability to comprehend a text begins with the ability to read it properly, which can be evaluated through its readability quality. It is important to note that the process of understanding fundamentally begins with reading, a cognitive activity. Several specific factors may influence the readability scores of these standards. These include translation-related issues, the absence of examples tailored to Turkish businesses, and the need to adapt scenarios that are not commonly encountered in Turkey. Such factors may have resulted in standards that are longer and more complex than their original versions.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Destekleyen kurum bulunmamaktadır.

Ethical Statement

Makale akademik etik ilkeler ve kurallar doğrultusunda hazırlanmış olup, makalede intihal bulunmamaktadır.

References

  1. Adelberg, A.H. (1982). An empirical evaluation of the communication of authoritative pronouncements in accounting. Accounting and Finance, 22(2), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.1982.tb00037.x
  2. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. (2009, 14th March). Complexity in financial reporting. https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/financial reporting/tech-ms-com.pdf
  3. Ateşman, E. (1997). Türkçe’de okunabilirliğin ölçülmesi. A.Ü. Tömer Dil Dergisi, 58, 171-174.
  4. Australian Institute of Company Directors. (2004, 1st April). It's not what you say accounting. http://www.companydirectors.com.au/director-resource-centre/publications/company-director-magazine/2000-to-2009-back-editions/2004/october/its-not-what-you-say-accounting
  5. Bekçi, İ. (2007). Muhasebe meslek mensuplarının Türkiye muhasebe mtandartları hakkındaki görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, (22), 27-40.
  6. Chall, J.S. (1988). The beginning years. In Readability: Its Past, Present, and Future, Editor. B. L. Zakaluk and S. J. Samuels. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  7. Çetinkaya, G. & Uzun, L. (2018). Türkçe ders kitaplarındaki metinlerin okunabilirlik özellikleri, Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  8. Donelson, D.C., McInnis, J. & Mergenthaler, R.D. (2016). Explaining rules- based characteristics in U.S. GAAP: theories and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(3), 827–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12112

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Statistical Analysis , Financial Accounting

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 3, 2026

Submission Date

August 21, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 4, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 8 Number: 2

APA
Bellikli, U. (2026). Türkiye Muhasebe Standartları ve Finansal Raporlama Standartları Anlaşılabiliyor mu? Okunabilirlik Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Turkish Research Journal of Academic Social Science, 8(2), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.59372/turajas.1770246

ISSN: 2667-4491

Dear Authors,
According to the February 25, 2020 dated ULAKBIM decision, all kinds of researches conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from participants using survey, interview, focus group study, observation, experiment, interview techniques, and the use of humans and animals (including materials/data) for experimental or other scientific purposes require an Ethics Committee certificate.

The ethics committee approvals obtained in accordance with the “publication policy” of the articles submitted to the Turkish Academic Social Sciences Research Journal must be specified in the METHOD section of the article and uploaded to the system. Publications with plagiarism report over 20% and studies without ethics committee approval will not be evaluated for publication in our journal.
Thank you for your attention and understanding.

20120

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License 

20119