Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri

Abidin Kemeç

doi:10.59372/turajas.1885921

EN TR

Blockchain Based Recording Systems in Public Sector

Abstract

New generation technologies are used in many aspects of daily life. These technologies are thought to have many contributions such as cost and time efficiency, encouraging collaboration, increasing productivity, and enhancing customer/citizen satisfaction. Blockchain technology, one of the new generation technologies that has experienced unprecedented growth in recent years, is used because it provides transparency, instant data monitoring, holistic decision-making and increased efficiency. At the same time, blockchain technology helps central and local governments work more efficiently and innovate faster. The secure sharing of data between citizens and institutions increases trust while providing an immutable audit trail for contract management, identity management and citizen services.In parallel with technological developments, the public sector is witnessing a rapid change and transformation. This change and transformation is experienced in different dimensions at the country level. Blockchain technology has been used in the land registry system in Georgia, in financial systems in Singapore, in political elections in South Korea, in real estate ownership in the Government of Ghana, in real estate transactions in Sweden, and in data management in the United States. In Turkey, although regulations have been made for blockchain technology in the legal administrative dimension, comprehensive projects have not been implemented in the context of applications compared to other countries. The aim of the study is to evaluate the application examples of blockchain technology in the public sector. In the study, case study method, which is one of the qualitative research designs, was preferred.

Keywords

Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri

Abstract

Yeni nesil teknolojiler günlük hayatın birçok noktasında kullanılmaktadır. Bu teknolojilerin; maliyetten ve zamandan verimliliği sağlaması, iş birliğini teşvik etmesi, üretkenlik artışı sağlaması, müşteri/vatandaş memnuniyetini arttırması gibi çok sayıda katkısı olduğu düşünülmektedir. Son yıllarda benzeri görülmemiş bir büyüme yaşayan yeni nesil teknolojilerden olan blok zincir teknolojisi şeffaflık, anlık veri izleme, bütünsel karar alma ve verimlilik artışı sağladığı için kullanılmaktadır. Aynı zamanda blok zinciri teknolojisi, merkezi ve yerel yönetimlerin daha verimli çalışmasına ve daha hızlı yenilik yapmasına yardımcı olmaktadır. Vatandaşlar ve kurumlar arasında verilerin güvenli bir şekilde paylaşılması, sözleşme yönetimi, kimlik yönetimi ve vatandaş hizmetleri için değişmez bir denetim sağlarken güveni artırmaktadır. Teknolojik gelişmelere paralel olarak kamu sektöründe hızlı bir değişim ve dönüşüme sahne olmaktadır. Bu değişim ve dönüşüm ülke ölçeğinde ele alındığında farklı boyutlarda yaşanmaktadır. Gürcistan’da tapu sisteminde, Singapur’da finansal sistemlerde; Güney Kore’de, siyasi seçimlerde; Gana Hükümetinde, taşınmaz mülkiyetinde; İsveç’te gayrimenkul işlemlerinde, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde veri yönetiminde blok zinciri teknolojisinden faydalanmıştır. Türkiye’de her ne kadar yasal yönetsel boyutta blok zinciri teknolojisine yönelik düzenlemeler gerçekleştirilse de uygulamalar bağlamında diğer ülkelerle kıyaslandığında kapsamlı projeler hayata geçirilmemiştir. Çalışmanın amacı kamu sektöründe blok zinciri teknolojisinin uygulama örneklerini değerlendirmektir. Çalışmada, nitel araştırma desenlerinden olan örnek durum incelemesi yöntemi tercih edilmiştir.

Keywords

Abstract

References

Addison, C. (2019). Opportunities of Blockchain for agriculture (Briefing No. 55). European Union. Erişim Adresi: https://brusselsbriefings.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/bb55-reader_blockchain-opportunities-for-agriculture_en.rev_.pdf
Alotaibi, E. M., Issa, H., ve Codesso, M. (2025). Blockchain-based conceptual model for enhanced transparency in government records: A design science research approach. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(1), 100304.
Ansong, E. D., Appiah, J., ve Odoi-Lartey, B. (2019). Digital Voting Systems Deploying the use of Blockchain Technology. International Journal of Computer Applications, 975, 8887.
Apeh, O. O., ve Nwulu, N. I. (2025). Enhancing transparency and efficiency in green energy management through blockchain: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Energy Nexus, 100405.
Aytaç, A., ve Çakır, S. (2023). An analysis of the feasibility of blockchain technology in the national defense industry. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(27), 525-541.
Baralla, G., Ibba, S., Marchesi, M., Tonelli, R., ve Missineo, S. (2019). A blockchain based system to ensure transparency and reliability in food supply chain. In Euro-Par 2018: Parallel Processing Workshops: Euro-Par 2018 International Workshops, Turin, Italy, August 27-28, 2018, Revised Selected Papers 24 (pp. 379-391). Springer International Publishing.
Berryhill, J., Bourgery, T., ve Hanson, A. (2018). Blockchains unchained: Blockchain technology and its use in the public sector. ECD Work. Papers Public Governance, no. 28, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1787/3c32c429-en.
Bharadwaj, C. (2024). Kamu sektöründe blok zincir teknolojisi kullanımı, Erişim Adresi: https://appinventiv.com/blog/role-of-blockchain-in-government/.

Brilliantova, V., ve Thurner, T. W. (2019). Blockchain and the future of energy. Technology in Society, 57, 38-45.
Bustamante, P., Cai, M., Gomez, M., Harris, C., Krishnamurthy, P., Law, W., ... ve Weiss, M. (2022). Government by code? Blockchain applications to public sector governance. Frontiers in blockchain, 5, 869665.
Cheng, S., Daub, M., Domeyer, A., ve Lundqvist, M. (2017). Using blockchain to improve data management in the public sector. Erişim Adresi: https://www. mckinsey. com/business-functions/mckinseydigital/our-insights/using-blockchain-to-improve-data-management-in-the-public-sector.
Da Xu, L., ve Viriyasitavat, W. (2019). Application of blockchain in collaborative Internet-of-Things services. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 6(6), 1295-1305.
Dhumane, A. V., Ranjan, N., Tamboli, M., Prasad, J. R., ve Prasad, R. S. (2025). A secure data sharing framework with AESMO enabled key generation in consortium blockchain based E-government system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 317, 113160.
Di Pierro, M. (2017). What is the blockchain?. Computing in Science & Engineering, 19(5), 92-95.
Dubovitskaya, A., Novotny, P., Xu, Z., ve Wang, F. (2020). Applications of blockchain technology for data-sharing in oncology: Results from a systematic literature review. Oncology, 98(6), 403-411.
English, M., Auer, S., ve Domingue, J. (2016). Block Chain Technologies & The Semantic Web: AFramework for Symbiotic Development. The Semantic Web, 15.
Galici, M., Mureddu, M., Ghiani, E., Celli, G., Pilo, F., Porcu, P., ve Canetto, B. (2021). Energy blockchain for public energy communities. Applied Sciences, 11(8), 3457.
GeeksforGeeks, (2024), Blok Zinciri Nasıl Çalışır?, Erişim Adresi: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/how-does-the-blockchain-work/ .
Goodarzian, F., Abraham, A., ve Ghasemi, P. (2023). Key success factors for blockchain implementation in supply chain management. In Blockchain in a volatile-uncertain-complex-ambiguous world (pp. 219-231). Elsevier.
Gülen, K. G., ve Karaağaç, A. (2024). Agricultural food supply chain with blockchain technology: A review on Turkey. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 16(2), 013-028.
Hasse, F., von Perfall, A., Hillebrand, T., Smole, E., Lay, L., ve Charlet, M. (2016). Blockchain–an opportunity for energy producers and consumers. PwC Global Power & Utilities, 1-45.
Hyvärinen, H., Risius, M., ve Friis, G. (2017). A blockchain-based approach towards overcoming financial fraud in public sector services. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 441-456.
Iansiti, M., ve Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118-127. Kemeç, A. (2022). Akıllı Ülke Deneyimlerinin Karşılaştırılması: Estonya ve Singapur Örnekleri. Kent Akademisi, 15(2), 630-647.
Korjus, K. (2017). “Welcome to the blockchain nation,” E-Residency Blog, Erişim Adresi: https://medium.com/e-residency-blog/welcome-to-the-blockchain-nation-5d9b46c06fd4.
Kshetri, N., ve Voas, J. (2018). Blockchain in developing countries. It Professional, 20(2), 11-14.
Kumar, C. O., Gajendran, S., Balaji, V., Nhaveen, A., ve Balakrishnan, S. S. (2024). Retraction Note: Securing health care data through blockchain enabled collaborative machine learning. Soft Computing, 27(14), 9941-9954.
Kwon, H., Mohaisen, A., Woo, J., Kim, Y., Lee, E., ve Kim, H. K. (2016). Crime scene reconstruction: Online gold farming network analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 12(3), 544-556.
Langford, R. (2001). Navigating the maze of nursing research: an interactive learning adventure. (No Title). Li, W., Liu, Z., Chen, J., Liu, Z., ve He, Q. (2025). Towards Blockchain Interoperability: A Comprehensive Survey on Cross-Chain Solutions. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 100286.
Li, X., Jiang, B., ve Bai, Y. (2025). Manufacturers' decision making on emission reduction based on blockchain technology-analysis under the government's carbon cap-and-trade policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 499, 145224.
Li, Z., Xu, X., Bai, Q., Guan, X., ve Zeng, K. (2021). The interplay between blockchain adoption and channel selection in combating counterfeits. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 155, 102451.
Nakamoto S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, Decentralized Business Review (2008), p. 21260
Nash, K. S. (2018). Walmart requires lettuce, spinach suppliers to join blockchain. The Wall Street Journal, 1.
Niranjanamurthy, M., Nithya, B. N., ve Jagannatha, S. J. C. C. (2019). Analysis of Blockchain technology: pros, cons and SWOT. Cluster Computing, 22, 14743-14757.
Niu, B., Xu, H., ve Chen, L. (2022). Creating all-win by blockchain in a remanufacturing supply chain with consumer risk-aversion and quality untrust. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 163, 102778.
Özdemir, N. E., Cerev, G., Sarıipek, D. B., ve Tosun, S. (2024). Blockchain technology and social policy transformation: A critical examination and recommendations. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, (87), 15-23. Pakseresht, A., Kaliji, S. A., ve Hakelius, K. (2024). Blockchain technology characteristics essential for the agri-food sector: A systematic review. Food Control, 110661.
Pereira, G. V., Charalabidis, Y., Alexopoulos, C., Mureddu, F., Parycek, P., Ronzhyn, A., ... ve Wimmer, M. A. (2018, May). Scientific foundations training and entrepreneurship activities in the domain of ICT-enabled governance. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (pp. 1-2).
Pun, H., Swaminathan, J. M., ve Chen, J. J. (2025). Application of blockchain in the secondary market with counterfeiting. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 197, 104079.
Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. 3. Baskı. Sage, California
Qiuyn, S., ve A. Price. (2018). A blockchain-based land titling project in the republic of Georgia. Innovations Technology Governance Globalization, 12 (2018): 72-78.
S. A. Tapscott, Don, Tapscott, Alex, Blockchain Revolution, 4th ed. Penguin USA (2019). ISBN: 978-84-234-2655-3 Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., ve Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships tosustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.
Sanka, A. I., Irfan, M., Huang, I., ve Cheung, R. C. (2021). A survey of breakthrough in blockchain technology: Adoptions, applications, challenges and future research. Computer Communications, 169, 179-201.
Sarmah, S. S. (2018). Understanding blockchain technology. Computer Science and Engineering, 8(2), 23-29.
Shahzad, A., Zhang, K., ve Gherbi, A. (2020). Intuitive development to examine collaborative iot supply chain system underlying privacy and security levels and perspective powering through proactive blockchain. Sensors, 20(13), 3760.
Shin, L. (2016). Republic of Georgia to pilot land titling on blockchain with economist Hernando De Soto, BitFury. Erişim Adresi: https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2016/04/21/republic-of-georgia-to-pilot-land-titling-on-blockchain-with-economist-hernando-de-soto-bitfury/
Shin, L. (2020). The first government to secure land titles on the bitcoin blockchain expands project. Erişim Adresi: https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2017/02/07/the-first-government-to-secure-land-titles-on-the-bitcoin-blockchain-expands-project/.
Stake, R., ve Visse, M. (1995). Case study research. Cham: Springer.
Steiner, J., ve J. Baker. (2023). Blockchain: The Solution for Transparency in Product Supply Chains. Erişim Adresi: https://www.provenance.org/whitepaper.
Sunmola, F., ve Burgess, P. (2023). Transparency by design for blockchain-based supply chains. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 1256-1265.
Sunny, J., Undralla, N., ve Pillai, V. M. (2020). Supply chain transparency through blockchain-based traceability: An overview with demonstration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 150, 106895.
Tan, E., Mahula, S., ve Crompvoets, J. (2022). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101625.
The Computer Language Company Inc. Data Transparency. (2025). Data transparency.Erişim Adresi: https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/data+transparency.
Tight, M. (2010). The curious case of case study: a viewpoint. International journal of social research methodology, 13(4), 329-339.
Tripathi, G., Ahad, M. A., ve Casalino, G. (2023). A comprehensive review of blockchain technology: Underlying principles and historical background with future challenges. Decision analytics journal, 9, 100344.
Türkmen, S. Y., ve Durbilmez, S. E. (2019). Blockchain teknolojisi ve Türkiye finans sektöründeki durumu. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 30-45.
Venkatesh, V. G., Kang, K., Wang, B., Zhong, R. Y., ve Zhang, A. (2020). System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 63, 101896.
Viriyasitavat, W., Da Xu, L., Bi, Z., ve Hoonsopon, D. (2019). Blockchain technology for applications in internet of things—mapping from system design perspective. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 8155-8168.
Wamba, S. F., Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Lu, Q., ve Queiroz, M. M. (2024). How emerging technologies can solve critical issues in organizational operations: An analysis of blockchain-driven projects in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101912.
Warkentin, M., ve Orgeron, C. (2020). Using the security triad to assess blockchain technology in public sector applications. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102090.
Yaşa, A. A. (2022). Kamu sektöründe blok zincir teknolojisi kullanımı: Türkiye'de mevcut durum analizi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 17(66), 615-633.
Yi, X., ve Zhewei, Y. (2020). Current situation and prospect of medical application of blockchain technology Clinical Surgery Journal, 28(4), pp. 304-307, 10.3969/j.ISSN.1005-6483.2020.04.002.
Yin RK. (2003). Case study research; designs and method, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Yoon, Y. (2018). Korean Gov't Unveils Blockchain Technology Development Strategy, Erişim Adresi: http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=23184.
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., ve Wang, H. (2017) An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. in: 2017 IEEE Int. Congr. Big Data (BigData Congr., IEEE, pp. 557–564.
Zhu, X., Shi, J., ve Lu, C. (2019). Cloud health resource sharing based on consensus-oriented blockchain technology: Case study on a breast tumor diagnosis service. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(7), e13767.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Public Policy, Public Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Abidin Kemeç ^*
0000-0001-9395-4118
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 30, 2026

Submission Date

February 10, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 13, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.59372/turajas.1885921

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA42KM89BX

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kemeç, A. (2026). Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri. Turkish Research Journal of Academic Social Science, 9(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.59372/turajas.1885921

AMA

1.Kemeç A. Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri. TURAJAS. 2026;9(1):40-49. doi:10.59372/turajas.1885921

Chicago

Kemeç, Abidin. 2026. “Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri”. Turkish Research Journal of Academic Social Science 9 (1): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.59372/turajas.1885921.

EndNote

Kemeç A (April 1, 2026) Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri. Turkish Research Journal of Academic Social Science 9 1 40–49.

IEEE

[1]A. Kemeç, “Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri”, TURAJAS, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 40–49, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.59372/turajas.1885921.

ISNAD

Kemeç, Abidin. “Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri”. Turkish Research Journal of Academic Social Science 9/1 (April 1, 2026): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.59372/turajas.1885921.

JAMA

1.Kemeç A. Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri. TURAJAS. 2026;9:40–49.

MLA

Kemeç, Abidin. “Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri”. Turkish Research Journal of Academic Social Science, vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2026, pp. 40-49, doi:10.59372/turajas.1885921.

Vancouver

1.Abidin Kemeç. Kamu Sektöründe Blok Zincir Tabanlı Kayıt Sistemleri. TURAJAS. 2026 Apr. 1;9(1):40-9. doi:10.59372/turajas.1885921