Diğer

Kıraatlerde Tercih Ve Tenkitlerin Kıraatlerin Sahihliği Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 11 Ocak 2023
PDF İndir
EN TR

Evaluation of Preferences and Criticisms in Recitations in terms of Authenticity of Leases

Abstract

The Qur'an is the main source of the religion of Islam. That's why Muslims believe in the Qur'an. They made great efforts to be read and understood as the Prophet conveyed and taught. As can be seen in the narrations about the seven letters, during the Prophet's time, the Companions accused each other of reciting each other in a way other than what the Prophet taught, due to different recitations. When such events were reported to the Prophet, he said that "the Qur'an was revealed in seven letters, and that they should read whatever is easy from it". Reading the easiest one among the options also requires making a choice. Thus, different recitations continued to exist. Over time, some recitations that did not have a sound attribution and did not comply with the rules of Arabic grammar were mixed among these recitations. Scholars specialized in the business of recitation tried to find a solution to this situation, they determined the correct ones and eliminated the ones that were not. As a result, the majority of the Islamic Ummah agreed on the authenticity and reliability of the seven recitations determined by the recitation scholars and the ten recitations added to them later. But they did this in terms of the integrity of the recitation. While evaluating these recitations one by one, they preferred one of them over the others. Again, some of these generally accepted recitations were evaluated and criticized one by one. These preferences and criticisms were mostly made by commentators and linguists who are experts in Arabic. The preference and criticism in the recitations is an important factor in evaluating the authenticity of the recitations.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Albayrak, H. "Taberî ve Kıraat (Camiu’l-Beyan an Te’vili’l-Kur’an Çerçevesinde)". Kur’an Ve Tefsir Araştırmaları-IV. ed. Bedreddin Çetiner. 355-386. İstanbul: Ensar Neşriyat, 2002.
  2. Boşat, S. “Kıraat İmamlarında İhtiyar Olgusu”. Hikmet Yurdu, 13/25, (Ocak – Haziran 2020/1), 89-108.
  3. Buharî, M. (1992). Sahihu’l-Buharî. İstanbul: Çağrı Yayınları.
  4. Çetin, A. (2005). Kur’an-ı Kerim’in İndirildiği Yedi Harf ve Kıraatler. İstanbul: Ensar Neşriyat.
  5. Dağ, M. (2011). Geleneksel Kıraat Algısına Eleştirel Bir Yaklaşım. İstanbul: İsam Yayınları.
  6. Danî, E. A. (1999). Camiü’l-Beyan Fi’l-Kıraati’s-Seb’a’l-Meşhure. thk. M. Kemal Atik. Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları.
  7. Dimyatî, A. (1987). İthafü Fudalai’l-Beşer bi’l- Kıraati’l-Erbeate Aşer. thk. Şaban Muhammed İsmail. Beyrut: Alemü’l-Kütüb.
  8. Ebu Davud, S. (1992). Sünen-i Ebi Davud. İstanbul: Çağrı Yayınları.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Din Araştırmaları

Bölüm

Diğer

Yayımlanma Tarihi

11 Ocak 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Aralık 2022

Kabul Tarihi

1 Ocak 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Akpınar, M. (2023). Kıraatlerde Tercih Ve Tenkitlerin Kıraatlerin Sahihliği Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Research Journal of Academic Social Science, 5(2), 92-100. https://izlik.org/JA95ZS95FJ

ISSN: 2667-4491

20120

Bu ürün Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence tarafından lisanslanmıştır.

20119